Confessions of an Evangelical UU

Why We Are Non-Creedal

Another thing that came up at the "Now is the Time" conference, surprisingly, was creedalism. One of the participants, in his desire to spread the good news of Unitarian Universalism to people of color, argued that we should do away with our wishy-washy "noncreedalism" - that this type of moral relativism would turn off PoCs who's realities tell them that not all views are equally valid. He argued that it was time we UUs took up a creed and suggested our Seven Principles.

I went up to him and adamantly defended our non-creedalism. (We parted on good terms.) Actually, I agreed with him whole-heartedly about being against moral relativism, which is, I think, a superficial, "feel-good" stance reserved only for those who have never experienced oppression. But creedalism is not the answer. There is a world of difference between saying that all views are equally valid and saying that there is only one right one, which is what creedalism does. I want to be somewhere in between those two extremes.

Not all views are equally valid. Some are in fact quite harmful. Unitarian Universalism does NOT say that you can believe whatever you want. NO. But UU does explicitly affirm "acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth" (our third principle), "a free and responsible search for truth and meaning" (our fourth principle), and "the right of conscience" (our fifth principle). All of these assert that there is no single correct Truth - something that people must agree upon before they can be in community with us.

And that is what a creed is; it's an assertion of "Truth" that others must accept in order to be part of the religious community." The Nicene Creed. The Apostles' Creed. They are a test about "correct beliefs" to see who gets into the club and who doesn't. For us to say we are creedal would be to say that we don't accept people for who they are, we don't encourage them to grow and search for truth (because, after all, we already have it), and we deny the right of conscience. Right of conscience is like one of the cornerstones of UU, imo.

If we are to take our Seven Principles seriously, we cannot have a creed. Our universalism is quite clear and demanding on this subject. If for some reason a skinhead or a Nazi came through our doors wanting to be in relationship with us, then we are in relationship with him or her. We can unequivocally reject his/her racist beliefs and forbid their expression within our walls, for the sake of our other members. But we cannot reject the person.

Unitarian Universalism has no creed.

Cultural (Mis)Appropriation

One of the many topics that came up at meals and breaks during the Now is the Time" conference was cultural misappropriation. It is of course a concern amongst UUs who are trying to be sensitive to multiculturalism, especially after what I call the "Zulu hula" fiasco at General Assembly in St. Louis (2006). During a plenary session, several women got up on stage and led us in a sing-a-long/dance. Plenary sessions are long and convention centers often overly air-conditioned, so getting up and moving is not a bad idea. The problem is that it was white women encouraging us to use a Zulu freedom dance as an exercise routine.

What was amazing to me in the aftermath of that uproar (for indeed it did cause a polite but passionate uproar) was that many white UUs had no idea what the offense was. I heard people say they thought that as long as the history of the dance was explained beforehand (which it was), then it was alright to use it. From my perspective, it depends on how one uses it. Is it done with respect for the context in which it was created or is it being colonized? And by that I mean taken from the original owners and "repackaged " for our enjoyment. The latter is cultural misappropriation.

I am usually careful to say misappropriation, because imo, cultural appropriation is a fact of life in a multicultural society. This woman of Chinese descent living in the U.S. eats pizza and tacos and collard greens and creme brulee. And people from all over the world, of all ethnicities, listen to and perform hip hop music. Cultural appropriation is a foregone conclusion. And it's not a bad thing. It's what naturally happens when different cultures interact and someone sees value in someone else's cultural expressions. Real value - ie, sees meaning. Not commercial value, nor cultural "collecting."

Which brings me to an experience immediately after the conference. I had arranged with my family for them to meet me in the town of Mountain View for dinner before I flew back to DC. My father had selected a restaurant on Castro Street, a pleasant small street lined with shops and eateries, mostly but not entirely Chinese-owned. Arriving there before them, I strolled the street, going into various shops. Repeatedly in these Chinese owned shops, I saw the influence of living in the U.S. In the Chinese grocery store there were tortillas and the obligatory Cafe du Monde coffee. (For some reason, Chinese grocery stores in the U.S. always carry Cafe du Monde coffee from New Orleans.) In a couple of the shops, green Irish decorations sat next to Chinese tsotchkes, in anticipation of St. Patrick's Day. Christian paraphernalia mingled with statues of Kwan Yin, all in cramped little aisles packed to the brim with merchandise. Chaotic and wonderful.  And in an Italian gelateria the flavors included green tea, red bean, and ginger. Fusion cuisine at its finest.

On the same street, however, was a New Age store, with what looked like aging white boomers behind the counter. Next to self-help books, crystals and "Angel" trinkets were Celtic runes, African incense, Hindu and Buddhist deities, Taoist feng shui items, Native American fetishes and ritual items... all sanitized into an easily digestible mediocrity. I'm not fond of New Age stores in the first place but the stark contrast made it even more unpleasant.

I've been thinking about what it is that makes the New Age store different from the other shops on the street. They were all selling stuff in order to make a living, so that wasn't it. It's the difference, I think, between living with your neighbors and playing tourist.

 

Come, come, whoever you are

Caught a red-eye from Cali to DC so I was unable to share with you yesterday the wonderful experience of Sunday worship at the First Unitarian Church of San Jose.

First of all, the architecture is stunning. Located downtown, across the street from a city park, surrounded important looking buildings, I notice once again how prominent and prestigious our old churches tend to be. An large adobe building with a round sanctuary and beautiful stained-glass, even on the ceiling. It speaks to the Hispanic heritage of San Jose. Behind the pulpit, the main alcove was decorated with a large vase of flowers, a partially blanketed globe that was turned to center on Latin America, and various decorations painted and lacquered in the Latin style, including a cross. I took pictures. Will upload them when I have the time.

Secondly, we went to the 9:30 am service, which is entirely in Spanish. The hymns were in Spanish. We sang Spirit of Life and Come, come, whoever you are. There is something so powerful about singing these songs in particular in other languages. (I've decided I am going to translate "Come, come whoever" you are into Chinese.) And the choir sang some lovely songs that were clearly written in Spanish, not translations. One in particular spoke of how whenever people help each other, there is God walking with them. (I am going to ask John if we can sing it at All Souls.)

Senior minister, Nancy Palmer Jones, who gave an impressive homily on Saturday, welcomed the conference participants to her church and then introduced the preacher for that Sunday - Roberto Padilla. And Dr. Padilla preached a sermon that politely kicked our butts. Addressing head on the issue of privilege, he talked about his own experiences with it coming from a family of means in Mexico, and how his initial foray into social justice in a rural community was flawed as he feared the very people whom he trying to help. Only by interacting with the people in contexts outside of his medical clinic - actually living with them, did he get over the fear and learn to work in partnership. By addressing the issue of privilege from his own experience, he challenged us in a non-confrontational way to get over our own fear and guilt, and to use the power that has been given to us.

[Note: I've since posted Dr. Padilla's sermon in both English and Spanish. Many thanks for his generosity.]

Listening to the sermon in both Spanish in one ear and the simultaneous English translation in the other ear was an odd experience, as Rev Jones warned us it would be. I know ridiculously little Spanish, but I could tell that the translator was excellent. And I was amazed by the commitment of this congregation to this effort, for it was a great deal of effort to buy dozens of wireless headsets and to arrange for an interpreter each week.

Moreover, I was impressed to learn that it didn't end at Sunday service, which by itself would be mostly symbolic. The church was also committed financially to offering Spanish classes for us Gringos (do I count as a Gringo?) and ESL classes and citizenship classes for Latin immigrants in the area. This was a comprehensive, long-term commitment to the Latin community in the area. The First Unitarian Church of San Jose clearly takes seriously the words of the song, "Come, come, whoever you are."

Survival

As much as I loved yesterday's part of the "Now Is the Time" conference, I had difficulty with the programing today. Dr. Butler asked us to reflect on and share our deepest longing with respect to this work. I did not want to share my deepest desire with some stranger whom I'd only just met. This is perhaps strange since I am willing to share with theoretically the entire world via the internet. I'm willing to throw it out there into the wind. But sitting in the hotel conference room next to flesh and blood, I felt vulnerable and defensive. The truth is that my deepest desire is simply to not hurt anymore. That is all I want.

It seemed to me like a small and selfish desire, unbefitting a UU and someone who was at this conference presumably for greater concerns. Hence my unwillingness to share. But it is not a small task to not hurt anymore. Nor does it only involve myself. I hurt every time I see someone else mistreated based on race (or religion/gender/orientation for that matter). So to relieve my pain we would have to relieve theirs. I hurt - I ache all over - whenever a white friend denies the reality of our suffering. So to relieve my pain we would have to open eyes/minds/hearts that are closed. It is no small task. I suppose I could have shared my desires in these grander terms, but the truth is that I just want to not hurt anymore.

After the scheduled programming, we broke into small informal caucuses. And it was good - it was amazing - to have people of African descent, Latinas, and Asians all in the same room. We aired our grievances, confessed our fears, affirmed and forgave each other.

One of the Asian women whom I'd met expressed an anger I have felt myself and heard other PoCs express. In telling a white UU that she wanted to work on racial justice, the response she got back was "Cool, I'm interested in animal rights." The logical conclusion here is that the physical and emotional welfare of humans of color is on par with the welfare of animals. And that this is some sort of "interest" as in hobby, which could change next week.

Racial justice is not an "interest." As our companion forcefully expressed, "My survival depends on it!" For a spit second my censoring brain considered labeling this statement as hyperbole, but then I remembered the conversation from only last Sunday. Her survival really does depend on it. All of ours does.

Making Contact

Today was the first day of the "Leading Congregations into a Multiracial, Multicultural Future" conference in San Jose, CA. Having to fight both the pouring rain and traffic, the commute from SF to San Jose took about two and a half times as long as expected and I arrived wet and annoyed, having missed the opening worship. I scanned the room from the back for someone I knew - anyone - briefly wondered, "why am I even here?!" and then spotted the familiar and always comforting form of Paula Cole Jones. Settling in next to her, I was ready to learn how to make our congregations more multicultural.

Dr. Jackie Lewis was wonderful. Energetic and sympathetic. She is the senior minister of Middle Collegiate Church in NYC, the church that Rob had mentioned as a model for diversity. I can see why.

As we took a fifteen minute break, I stood at the back of the room and watched its dynamics (something I like to do). Spotting an Asian woman at the front who was preparing to exit (in my direction), I knew from experience what was going to happen next.

Within seconds she spotted me. Her eyes lit up in recognition and she came straight towards me. "Are you Chinese?" she asked. Yes, I nodded. Wow, she was so excited to see another Asian face at a UU function. Black UUs may feel isolated in our mostly white congregations and need these kinds of conferences to connect. API UUs often feel isolated even in these kinds of conferences. So there we were, two Asians who had found each other. I soon learned that there was another Chinese woman here too. Three of us. We had lunch together. I told them about A/PIC and the recent conference. They expressed interest in joining.

And the part of me that is always the observer couldn't help but be amused at myself. Not that long ago I would have resisted this. I would have resented the assumption that just because we were Asian we'd have common interests. I would have been hesitant to be seen "congregating" with other Asian lest we look like we're refusing to integrate, conspiring. So great was my internalized racism. If my two Asian companions had any similar thoughts, they kept it to themselves. It was simply good to not be alone.

Thank you A/PIC, for helping me to this place. And I guess I should also say, thank you Unitarian Universalism.

Self-Destruction and the Asian American Experience

I'm still digesting our work during the A/PIC conference. But I wanted to reflect on some themes I found today.

During the worship service, I heard a poem with which I am well familiar, Suicide Note, by Janice Mirikitani. Don't remember the first time I heard/read it but it's been many times since. Even glancing at the words now I feel the swell of emotion. I have felt the despair over imperfection.

After service we broke into small groups to answer questions as part of the "Building the World We Dream About" curriculum in which our conference host, Throop Memorial, is participating. Discussion participants shall remain nameless our of respect for their privacy, but you know since this was an A/PIC conference, the participants were APIs. One young woman talked about how she had been suicidal as a teen, until finally she decided that out of spite, she wasn't going to let the racism kill her. Her anger saved her.

It's been so long that I'd almost forgotten, but I was suicidal as a teen as well. Nearly every day I fantasized about different ways in which I could end my pain, but could never figure out how to do it without distressing others. One particularly bad night after I came in from walking in the rain, daring cars to run me over, a Chinese American friend I'd known from early childhood cursed me out. Invectives flying, she reminded me of my family and friends and how they would feel if I killed myself, reminded me of my filial obligations that are such a strong part of Asian culture. She told me that if I ended my life she would hate me for the rest of hers. I resolved that no matter how much it hurt to live, I would never kill myself. My friend's anger saved me.

----

I have lived with depression all my life. My father has it. I can see signs of it in my brother. I had always assumed that it was due to a genetically inherited chemical imbalance. Today was the first time that I considered that it might have something to do with being Asian American. After all, my family members have that in common too.

This isn't to say that all Asian Americans are depressed and suicidal. Obviously not. Nor to say that one shouldn't seek pharmaceutical help (tho I've personally always been resistant). But today was the first time where I considered that the stresses of trying to bridge the cultural divide may actually be causing self-destructive tendencies (ie - it's not just me and my faulty genes).

It's amazing that I'd never thought of that before, given how much Ms. Mirikitani's poem resonates with me.

Being Bridges

Today during the A/PIC conference, we broke up into small groups and did some strategic planning on what we envision A/PIC to be in the not too distant future, building on what we see as our strengths. I can't remember whether it was me or someone else in my group that first suggested it - we seemed to come to it together, naturally - the analogy of a bridge. API Americans at our best can be a bridge - from the past into the future, from the brokenness of our present world to the Beloved Community, from our respective "Old World"s to this "New World," from other people of color to whites...

This idea of being a bridge between other PoCs and whites is something that I have thought about many times in my life. Many times I have been "othered." I know what it's like to walk into a room of white people and wonder if I'll be accepted. In day to day interactions, if someone is rude to me for no apparent reason, I will wonder if it's because of my skin tone. This is something that I don't think many whites have had to deal with. The uncertainty that undermines one's confidence. I know what it's like to be a person of color.

Otoh, there have been times when I have "passed" in some strange way. Several times a white person has confided in me something that he or she probably wouldn't say in front of an African American. It's ranged from overtly racist comments to just a mention that they aren't comfortable walking in a certain neighborhood at night. I have the impression that I am considered "safe" if not white.

As Asian Americans we often carry certain privileges that don't come as easily to other PoCs. Many of the stereotypes about us, while still hurtful, are "positive" and can get us "in the door," unlike for many other PoCs. Many of us, not all, are well-educated and financially secure. We live, work, and play in circles that bring us into regular contact with white Americans. In fact, our relatively small numbers and isolation in many parts of the country almost ensures that to be the case. Even some of our disadvantages become opportunities in another light.

To be sure, there are ways in which we are decidedly at a disadvantage, such as our being perceived as perpetual foreigners. ("Where are you from?") Our loyalty to this country perpetually in doubt. But overall, we are in a covetable position, our experiences allowing us to see "both sides," heck, many sides of this issue of race that too often gets turned into black and white. What can we do with this opportunity? How can we use the fact that we are "less scary" to help our white sisters and brothers address the issues of racism that still pervade this country? How can we model constructive ways to live with each other?

Our very lives are bridges - it's what we've had to do to survive. How can we use that to help others?

Majority Minority

While visiting Pasadena, I'm staying with my friend Phoebe in her house in Temple City.  The towns south of Pasadena - Alhambra, Monterey Park, and San Gabriel - are notable for their high concentration of Asians.  (Monterey Park is over 55% Chinese.)  If you want good Chinese food in L.A., you don't go to Chinatown; you go to Alhambra and Monterey Park.  To the east in San Gabriel and Temple City, I noticed that there is more of a mixture of Asians and Latino/Hispanics.  Neighbors with straight dark hair and varying shades of tan skin living side by side.  

Driving northward towards Pasadena, I saw a blonde woman in sportswear walking her terrier and was surprised.  "What's she doing here?" I wondered.  The wonder lasted less than a second before I remembered that this is after all the U.S. and it was she who was the norm here, not me.  Still, however silly, the experience of surprise was something that I wanted to record and share.

Before heading over to the start of the A/PIC conference at Throop Memorial Church, I spent the day hanging out with old friends and visiting the Norton Simon Museum of Art.  What I remember about the Norton Simon is its fabulous collection of 19th and 20th century Western art - sculptures by Rodin and Moore, paintings by Picasso, Kandinsky, Klee and Degas.  What I did not remember about the museum was the even more impressive collection of Asian art - room after room of stunning bodhisattvas showcased beautifully.  How could I not remember this?  Guess I was not in the right frame of mind to appreciate it before.

As the A/PIC conference started, I met new friends, and as old friends started to trickle in I was struck by how moved I was to see them.  I call them "old friends" but really, some I've only known since last year and only for the few days of the conference.  But I was just so happy to be there.  So grateful.

And grateful for the generosity of Throop Memorial Church for opening it's doors to us.  As Rev. Clyde Grubbs explained the history of Throop Memorial and how Amos Throop was also responsible for founding Caltech, I let out an audible gasp.  For over six years I had studied at Caltech, much of that time searching for a more spiritual life, never knowing its connection to Unitarian Universalism.  It was as if the Spirit were telling me: see, this is where you were meant to be all along.

Sunrise Over Pacheco Pass

Happy Valentine's Day.

Flying after work from DC to Cali, I got into San Jose at 11pm last night (2am my time), picked up my rental car and drove about half an hour south to a Motel 6 in the town of Gilroy.  Sleeping about 5 hours, I woke at a quarter to 6 (luckily 8:45am my time) and by 6:30 was on the road, taking the 152 eastward to the I-5.  Living up to its reputation as "the garlic capitol of the world," Gilroy smelled of the stinking rose.  

I'm not sure why but I've always liked Gilroy.  Maybe it's the smell.  Maybe it's because I associate it with highway 152.  Driving through gently rolling green hills as the sun rose, watching the cows chew their breakfast.  Climbing higher until finally one crests at Pacheco Pass where the reservoir is - a deep blue lake cut into the mountains, the rising sun glinting off the water.  (Though I noticed that the water level was much lower than it should have been for this time of year.)

At just about 7am on the dot, I arrived at Casa de Fruita, as they were opening.  The "House of Fruit" started as a roadside stand but now is more of a kingdom of kitsch, complete with miniature train, motel and RV Park.  I got my fill of kitsch and chocolate covered dried fruit and was on the road again.

The drive down the 5 was sunny and uneventful.  Timed almost perfectly, I arrived in Pasadena to meet my former graduate adviser for lunch in the Huntington Gardens. They were as beautiful as I remember.

I spent the rest of the day catching up with old friends from Caltech and walking around the beautiful campus.  The weather, the timing, the company... it could not have been more perfect.  It was a blessed day.

Happy Darwin Day

Most people know today as Abraham Lincoln's birthday. What you might not know is that the man who saved the Union shares his birthday (to the year) with the man who proposed natural selection as the driving force for evolution. February 12th is "Darwin Day," promoted by some as an "international celebration of science and humanity," mainly in reaction against those that favor creationism/intelligent design.

As a former biologist, there is no doubt in my mind that the diversity of life on earth today came about by evolution. The common genetic origins that we share with all living organisms is seen not just in evolutionary theory but also genetics, developmental biology, molecular and cellular biology... In short, all of biology points to this unifying explanation. Even so, I would not normally be holding up Charles Darwin's birthday as something particularly important to note. So why am I doing it now?

Yesterday, February 11th, the Florida Department of Education held its final public hearing on new state-wide science standards that would supercede any policies at the local levels. The proposed standards, which have been favorably received by teachers and scientists, would make the teaching of evolution a required part of Florida's science education for the first time. This little fact drew people from all over the state to testify both in favor and against the proposed state standards. The controversy was so great that it eclipsed discussion on any other aspect of the proposed standards.

While I appreciate their sincerity, the arguments presented against the teaching of evolution show a fundamental lack of understanding of science and highlight the desperate need for improved science education. People argued that the word "theory" means it's unproven, ignoring the fact that science doesn't use the term that way. Few people go around disputing the theory of gravity, for example.

Nor do proponents of teaching intelligent design in science classrooms understand that while "God did it" is a valid theory, it is not a valid scientific theory. The assumption seems to be that "science teaches the truth and since I believe that creationism is true, science should teach it." In reality, science describes the natural world and thus has no room for supernatural explanations. Science is not saying that there is no God; it makes no statement about God whatsoever.

One seemingly open-minded suggestion was that kids should be exposed to "all theories of creation," and then free to decide which one they like best. That is great on a personal level. Every one of us is free to decide what we will and will not believe. However, we are not free to decide what is science and what is not science. Science is determined by an objective set of standards, not by subjective feeling nor popular vote.

Most shocking of all in this debate was the revelation that twelve county school districts in Florida have passed resolutions against the teaching of evolution in schools. Yes, twelve. First, I had no idea, after the Scopes (Monkey) Trial, that it was still possible to ban the teaching of evolution in schools. (What exactly does this mean? - will teachers be arrested or fired for teaching science?) Second, I would have thought that something like this would have received more attention than it has. A school board here and there is a blip; twelve school boards in one state is a movement. Yet so far, I've only been able to find scant mention of it in local Florida newspapers.

The Florida State Board of Education is scheduled to vote on the new science standards on Feb 19th. On this Darwin Day, let us pray that it votes to uphold education for future generations.

Pages

Subscribe to Confessions of an Evangelical UU

Forum Activity

Fri, 10/31/2014 - 08:11
Mon, 06/16/2014 - 07:09
Tue, 10/01/2013 - 22:01

Miscellania

wizdUUm.net is made possible in part by generous support from the Fahs Collaborative

Find us on Mastodon.